Bad Cop, Good Cop – Daniel Harless v. Matt Lyons

Post

The law enforcement community is split on right-to-carry issues, and the opinions vary greatly depending on where in the country you are…

Regardless of an officer’s personal feelings on the matter, they have a duty to uphold the law, observe citizen’s rights, and act in conduct becoming of an officer.

In Texas, odds are, you will be in good company with pro-gun-rights cops.
In New York, if you are lucky enough to get a permit, you would be best to keep it on the down low.
Here in Minnesota, it’s a roll of the dice, though your odds improve significantly the further from the metro you are.

This, of course, is not a hard-line rule. The following 2 videos show you what I mean…


Officer Daniel Harless – Canton, Ohio Police Department

This instance takes place in Canton, Ohio.  Traditionally, Ohio is on the friendlier side towards armed citizens.   Unfortunately William Barnett was not so lucky.  Barnett was accosted while pulled over while in an area known for prostitution.

As you can see in the video below, Officer Harless secures the passengers, and starts searching the vehicle prior to speaking to, or securing the driver.  While department policies differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, every one of my police officer friends inform me that it is department policy to question and secure the driver before searching.  They also are required to ask permission (4th amendment) first, even if they have probable cause / intent to search anyway.

WARNING: There is very profane and graphic language from Officer Harless in the video.  It may not be safe for work, children, etc.


As you saw in the video, Ohio’s carry law requires you to “promptly” notify an officer that you are carrying.  This differs from many other states (like Minnesota) that only require you to inform the officer when asked.

In my carry classes, I have always advised my students to inform the officer right away, by saying something to the effect of, “Officer, I want you to know that I have a permit to carry, and am carrying right now on my (left hip/ right hip / pocket, etc.).”  After seeing this video, I may reconsider that practice.

It appears that Barnett tried to inform the officer, but was repeatedly told to “shut-up”.  It appears that Officer Harless had already decided that Barnett was a criminal.  We  really don’t know WHY Barnett was there. He may have had a perfectly legitimate, though probably stupid, reason for being there.  The best way to avoid trouble, is to stay away from where trouble happens.  My friend, the late Joel Rosenberg, frequently said:

Don’t go to stupid places with stupid people and do stupid things.

That being said, being stupid is not a crime, and is not a reason for violating civil rights, and is certainly not a reason for executing someone, as Officer Harless indicated he “should have done” (13:38 in the video).

I think Barnett handled himself pretty well in the face of anger, threats against his life, threats against felony charges, and threats of police harassment.  He did not get aggressive and complied with all of the officers commands and questions.  However, Barnett was aware of the statute, and should have insisted on informing Harless, despite the command to “shut-up”.  Bartlett also talked WAY too much.  Once you have cuffs on, it’s time to shut up. Ask any police officer how many people have talked themselves out of being arrested after he’s decided to arrest them.  I have yet to hear of one.

Officer Harless on the other hand needs to be fired, and criminally prosecuted.
Officer Harless was initially put on paid administrative leave, and then went on medical leave.  (Probably because his admin leave was terminated, and he came up with some sort of medical issue, anger management I can only hope, so that he can keep getting a paycheck.)

I am glad that Barnett is out of hot water, and I sincerely hope that Canton fires Officer Harless and he is prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

UPDATE:

There has apparently been a national outcry to Canton city officials, calling for them to take action.  Rather than take action, Canton City Council President Allen Schulman angrily chastised conceal carry permit holders, and subtly blames them for actions of officers, like Harless.



Officer Matt J. Lyons Oceanside, CA Police Department

Now we can take a sharp contrast over to California.  California is one of the toughest places to be a gun owner.  Though they have concealed carry permits, unless you are famous, a politician, a significant campaign donor, or friends with brass, you won’t get a permit.
However, there IS a legal way to carry a handgun in California without a permit.  The gun must be OPEN, and fully visible.  The gun cannot be loaded, and any magazines for the gun must also be carried open and fully visible.

There is a growing movement in California of people exercising their right to carry the only way they can, open.  Because of the frequent police interactions they tend to have, those that do carry, often have video or audio recording equipment to ensure their rights are observed, and they have a means of defending themselves against actions of Harless-type thugs.

In California an officer is allowed to do a “12031(e) check ” to see verify the firearm is unloaded.  Some open carriers refuse to consent to such a search when asked, but will comply.  Some officers get confused by this, and are unsure of how to handle it.  Other officers are well aware of their jobs as public servants, the extent of their duties, and respect for citizen’s rights.  In the video below, you can see such an encounter.


From the minute Officer Lyons comes onto the scene, he controls the situation.  He knows what he has the right to do, and does not ask questions.  He informs “Jeremy” that he will return the firearms shortly.  When another officer is coming on scene, Officer Lyons promptly informs him “Code 4″,  and that there’s not a problem.  Lyons is polite, and respects “Jeremy’s” request to not further identify himself, and promptly sends him on his way.  That kind of job performance is amazing in and of itself, and outstanding in California.

I wish we could copy and paste Officer Matt Lyons’ attitude to many cops around the county.

Semper Fi Marine… and God bless you too!

I’ve sent Officer Lyons a letter thanking him for his outstanding public service.  If you would like to do the same, here is the info.

Officer Matt Lions
3855 Mission Avenue
Oceanside, CA 92054

Officer Lions’ Supervisor:
Sgt. Cosby
3855 Mission Avenue
Oceanside, CA 92054

  1. Erik Pakieser07-27-11

    Nice work Rob! Excellent post.

  2. Richard07-28-11

    It is alleged that the arrested man was consorting with a known prostitute, an allegation which even if true does not excuse Patrolman Daniel Harless’ actions; the Patrolman was clearly out of control and appears to be emotionally unsuitable to hold a position of authority. Canton Council President Allen Schulman in disparaging citizens who voiced concerns about the Patrolman’s actions is out-of-touch with reality and also needs to be removed. Whether in suit and tie, in uniform or a gang-banger on the streets: a thug is a thug.

  3. FNLN09-01-11

    I still find the outcry from the pro-gun community on this case to be laughable. The *only* reason pro-gun conservatives are crying foul is because the victim in this case was a CCW permit holder.

    If the same officer had made similar baseless threats against an innocent citizen who didn’t have a CCW permit, those on the pro-gun right would be falling over themselves making excuses for the officer and laying 100% of the blame on the suspect. To pro-gun conservatives only other pro-gun conservatives have rights, everyone else can go pound sand.

    • ray02-28-12

      You don’t have to be a conservative to have a ccw. Having a ccw is the legal way to carry in most states. In FL, without one, you are limited to the conveyance only with certain constraints. Your political affiliation has nothing to do with it. However, I am sure that you will find the left wing blue cool-aid crowd would like to do away with all legal options. Just go listen to Nancy’s and San Francisco rhetotric.

  4. AKW09-03-11

    Richard, you are correct on all counts. Harless seems to be an out of control, ego maniac with a bad case of roid rage. FNLN, I’m a pro-gun conservative. I’ve also worked with the Police on various projects. I wouldn’t care either way if this guy had a permit or not. I don’t think ANY officer with those kinds of anger issues should be on the street telling people “I should have pulled my Glock 40 and put 10 rounds into you”. What a complete ASS.

  5. A. Bouchard09-13-11

    Sorry Mr. Bartlett is not out of trouble, instead of taking Harless straight to disiplinary action the city overlords have manipulated things to put Bartlett on trial–for: “being stopped by the side of the road” and “failing to inform the officer of a firearm”. Now officer Harless is claiming PTSD…Give me a break, this thug with a badge and gun and his partner have been thugs for too long, let’s call it what it is.

  6. D. Ablo03-19-12

    Lions should be the model for all police officers. He understands the interplay between his duty and citizens’ rights, and knows that he gets his job done efficiently by being courteous, respectful and professional, all without ever losing control of the situation. This other guy (Harless) just needs to find another job. He missed his calling when the allies were successful in Europe.

Leave a Reply